The culture industry makes fun of classical music even while defending it.
No, and that’s OK.
Painting, drawing and sculpture, although they are always the bearers of ideological elements, and acquire significant aspects of their particular forms through socio-economic influences, are, as material practices, no more reducible to ideology than are childhood, spermatozoa, or, above all, ‘man’.
Part 1 of “In Defense of Art” is here; part 3 is here. I must be clear and explicit about the political position from which I am working. I therefore wish to make absolutely clear in what sense I am working within the Marxist tradition, and what sort of “Marxism”
Health is often taken for granted, but injury and convalescence force you to appreciate it. In the same way, the wreckage of mid-twentieth century art criticism and theory in grandiose socio-political “interventions” brings into focus a baseline psychological function of art. Peter Fuller saw the sickness in artists and critics
What we get from cultural reception now is not so much an “experience” or a single coherent “work of art” as an endless series of doses. (Part Two of Dosing Culture.)
What we get from cultural reception now is not so much an “experience” or a single coherent “work of art” as an endless series of doses.